tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post1825798894687056292..comments2023-05-16T11:33:40.343-04:00Comments on Dialogues On Global Warming: The Great "Warming Pause" Lie RevealedTales From The Travelshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12155749992445168195noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-87410158300659367382015-05-26T20:11:56.830-04:002015-05-26T20:11:56.830-04:00Point taken. Thanks.Point taken. Thanks.Christopher Keatinghttp://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-11429607478072514812015-05-26T20:09:55.386-04:002015-05-26T20:09:55.386-04:00It always felt to me like one could easily enginee...It always felt to me like one could easily engineer a 'pause' with those two giant spikes to work with. Something like soup finding its level in a bowl, until the bowl springs a tremendous leak, but that may take a few years, and we can keep up appearances until then. /s Didn't the article say something about Monckton having his own computer program to cherrypick the right start month/end month combinations. Given that 1998 spike, it doesn't surprise or impress me that it's possible. My instinct would be not to waste too much time on this issue. I mean the temperature rate of increase was relatively flat. So they are right about that. They ignore the fact that this entire (partial) flatness has been and is still at a higher temperature than the trend before it (which will take until 2025 to catch up, even if future temps remain absolutely flat). Since the late '90's it's been more like a <i>bask in the heat</i> than a pause in global warming.cunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-81300036655840142982015-05-26T19:19:30.085-04:002015-05-26T19:19:30.085-04:00I am now wondering if the data actually gives a &#...I am now wondering if the data actually gives a 'pause' as they claim. And, even if it does, what would you get if you stacked all of their individual 'flat lines.' It seems to me you should see a progression where each gets higher than the previous ones.Christopher Keatinghttp://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-53561156938282534282015-05-26T19:15:13.603-04:002015-05-26T19:15:13.603-04:00You are the first to see Version 2 of my graph. I ...You are the first to see Version 2 of my graph. I could still make changes if there's anything there abhorrent. I'm trying to come up with something that's a little more user-friendly. Feel free to substitute it above, or not.<br />Cheerscunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-25406183959466635102015-05-25T15:33:38.214-04:002015-05-25T15:33:38.214-04:00Thanks Christopher and Cunudiun,
I have sent a l...Thanks Christopher and Cunudiun,<br /><br /><br />I have sent a link to this article to the opinion editor of the Duluth News Tribune. Since it reveals such a common deception used by deniers, I thought he might want to read it since he has been responsive to some of the other long comments I have sent to the Tribune, and may actually decide to examine it. I have decided that although 300 words allows for only a bare-bones response to deniers, I can at least make the staff of the Tribune aware of the many deceptions they use.Peter Johnsonnoreply@blogger.com