tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post5952395300224364739..comments2023-05-16T11:33:40.343-04:00Comments on Dialogues On Global Warming: WUWT? and Monckton Caught LyingTales From The Travelshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12155749992445168195noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-30452835062909481942015-05-25T14:35:58.547-04:002015-05-25T14:35:58.547-04:00Good job.Good job.cunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-14156384003385779582015-05-25T14:10:09.851-04:002015-05-25T14:10:09.851-04:00I made a posting about your plot.
http://dialogue...I made a posting about your plot.<br /><br />http://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-great-warming-pause-lie-revealed.htmlChristopher Keatinghttp://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-6425245134588820312015-05-25T11:44:20.591-04:002015-05-25T11:44:20.591-04:00I saw the articles. It is unfortunate the media st...I saw the articles. It is unfortunate the media still feels the need to publish something like that. Just because someone has the right to say nonsense doesn't mean they have a right to get published.<br /><br />I looked up Gary Mount and found his twitter account. He's a real nut case. https://twitter.com/protoniceChristopher Keatinghttp://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-19994953995126808012015-05-25T11:17:12.111-04:002015-05-25T11:17:12.111-04:00Thanks. I post it in comments wherever as possible...Thanks. I post it in comments wherever as possible. Did you notice our sleazy friend Tom had an article on the weekend in the Toronto Sun. And the Augusta Free Press published a rebuttal to the one he did there. I posted comments underneath both, so you can find both by following my history. The Sun closed their comments section half an hour after some jerk claiming to be a "climate researcher", but whose main source of info is WUWT, replied to me, so I was unable to counter his assertion that NOAA publishes "junk science."cunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-41657278281897443492015-05-25T09:50:55.479-04:002015-05-25T09:50:55.479-04:00Very nice piece of work. The only way to get the &...Very nice piece of work. The only way to get the 'plateau' is to take an average greater than the trend. This is actually pretty sound proof of the reality of continued global warming. You need to get this circulated around as much as you can.Christopher Keatinghttp://dialoguesonglobalwarming.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-62301743723077781392015-05-24T22:25:13.976-04:002015-05-24T22:25:13.976-04:00Thanks. I should have been able to figure that out...Thanks. I should have been able to figure that out for myself. Just a little tired ...cunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-83244703366442832462015-05-24T22:14:50.206-04:002015-05-24T22:14:50.206-04:00Re posting to Daily Kos--I've never posted the...Re posting to Daily Kos--I've never posted there either, but it appears you do need to register. Then you can post a diary entry that can include uploaded images. At least that's what it looks like to me.David Greenbergnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-50295948540183880692015-05-24T21:59:20.053-04:002015-05-24T21:59:20.053-04:00Thanks. The Tamino article I provided a link to is...Thanks. The Tamino article I provided a link to is really brilliant, and once I read that, it became obvious that I could build that chart with a little knowledge of Excel and Photoshop. The Daily Kos article did show how Monckton cherry-picked his start <i>and end</i> months, which I hadn't realized he was doing. I mean it's really slimy not starting and ending at the same point in the year, no matter how bad the rest of it. (By the way, I've never posted at Kos. Do you know if is possible to post graphics there? I couldn't even find a place to post anything. Maybe I need to register before that becomes visible. Or else the comments on that article are closed. When I get the energy, I'll have another look.)cunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-32814013655739134582015-05-24T21:40:18.850-04:002015-05-24T21:40:18.850-04:00That seems to point out the absurdity of the "...That seems to point out the absurdity of the "no warming in ___ years" ruse even more clearly and concisely than the explanation in the Daily Kos article!David Greenbergnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-2771277745145708122015-05-24T20:31:54.886-04:002015-05-24T20:31:54.886-04:00If I'd known you were going to do a piece on M...If I'd known you were going to do a piece on Monckton, I would have sent you this a little sooner. It's a little graphical thing I put together based on his "No warming in [fill in the blank] years" chart that has reverberated far and wide across the deniers' online echo chamber/house of mirrors. My inspiration was Tamino's brilliant <a href="http://tamino.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/global-temperature-the-post-1998-surprise/" rel="nofollow"><i>Global Temperature: the Post-1998 Surprise</i></a>. What I did was embed Monckton's graph showing no warming into a graph of the full RSS data set, taking care to make sure everything lined up perfectly. Clearly, during entire period of the "pause" the temperature was elevated <i>above</i> the trend of previous years. Monckton not only cherry-picks the dataset (RSS) and the time period, but he doesn't tell you that the entire thing represents a <i>surge</i>, not a pause. Anyway, here it is:<br />http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/1652/2161/original.jpgcunudiunnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-90392639750075322442015-05-24T15:28:36.951-04:002015-05-24T15:28:36.951-04:00An excellent expose. What Monckton and other denie...An excellent expose. What Monckton and other deniers are, is comparable to being midway hustlers at county fairs---they frequently give an impressive sounding rattle trap spiel filled with falsehoods and errors---some of which must be quite embarrassing. And when Monckton responds to criticism by simply altering the words he previously used, his brazen hustling becomes so painfully obvious.<br /><br /><br />I enjoyed the short videos explaining some of the outrageous deceptions used by Monckton, as well as some devices used by his fellow deniers. Nothing is quite as absurd as a denier who works as a local weather but does not even have a BS in meteorology? Or like Moncton, whom after being caught in his own lie about being an adviser to Margaret Thatcher, then tries to backpedal by claiming that he was only joking? Ha Ha, Lord! Why should the future survival and health of mankind be of any real significance? Just go on offering your verbal teddy bears, as prizes for trying to beat a game that you know full well, is actually being rigged---by yourself and your fellow con-men---er deniers, er---scientists?Peter Johnsonnoreply@blogger.com