tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post7424277227031117319..comments2023-05-16T11:33:40.343-04:00Comments on Dialogues On Global Warming: Thoughts on Climate ArmageddonTales From The Travelshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12155749992445168195noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-73853391439568993152013-02-28T13:42:17.598-05:002013-02-28T13:42:17.598-05:00I'd really like to know what you WOULD do to g...I'd really like to know what you WOULD do to get everyone's attention? If alarmism isn't the way, then what is? My other point is that no one paid attention to what we were doing to the planet in the 1970s and here we are. Three-hundred years isn't as far away as you might think, especially if you have children.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-16224614516731615732012-05-28T10:59:31.010-04:002012-05-28T10:59:31.010-04:00I have stated and continue to state that the only ...I have stated and continue to state that the only way you can reject manmade global climate change is to reject science. The amount of scientific evidence is so overwhelming that anyone, doing a little research, can prove it is true.<br /><br />As for the naturally occurring climate change, in fact that is a subject of a great deal of research. Unfortunately for the climate change deniers, all scientific evidence is that we are in a naturally occurring cooling cycle. That means without the naturally occurring cycle things would be much worse than they currently are. This bodes poorly for when that cooling cycle finally comes to an end.<br /><br />It is possible to prove, via the scientific method, that manmade climate change is occurring. It is possible to prove, via the scientific method, that naturally occurring climate change is also occurring and is a cooling cycle. The climate change deniers are so adamant that the science does not support this. If that is truly the case then it should be a simple matter to prove, via the scientific method, that manmade emissions are not causing global climate change.<br /><br />You are right about one thing, though. No one will be taking my money. That is because there is no science to support the denier position.Tales From The Travelshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12155749992445168195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2581891759488770965.post-52134171270488651502012-05-28T10:38:16.536-04:002012-05-28T10:38:16.536-04:00"I will award $1000 of my own money to anyone..."I will award $1000 of my own money to anyone that can prove, via the scientific method, that man-made global climate change is not occurring"<br /><br />Um, I would think that you should be offering $1000 to anyone that can prove, via the scientific method, that man-made global climate change is occurring first.<br /><br />Next you might offer this $1000 to anyone that can prove, via the scientific method, that naturally-made global climate change is not occurring.<br /><br />All of these are impossible challenges. You could increase the sum to $10,000 and you'd still be safe, no one will take your money.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com