I have read some articles recently that highlighted these costs. One is a very amazing account of a kayak trip down a portion of the Colorado River recently revealed for the first time in over 30 years due to the ongoing drought in the Southwestern U.S. The writer of the article tells of how the Lake Powell reservoir is at 50% of capacity and this is revealing river channels and landforms that have been flooded since the early-1980s. He also talks of all of the businesses that have disappeared and of the cities that depend on the water from Lake Powell. I'm sure all of the people that lost their jobs due to this water shortage would have a problem with the claim that climate change is good for them. He also discusses the impact to agriculture and how it will mean higher food prices. (Make that check out to the billionaire of your choice.) The scientific evidence that the drought is linked to climate change is mounting almost daily. Even if there is some natural variability involved, it is clear that climate change is, at the least, making it more severe.
This article here is an interesting compilation of the worldwide costs. This is a table they presented, based on IPCC data. Take a look and find your region:
Source: Business Insider |
As long as the media portrays liberals as the ones monetizing climate protection, we're screwed. The right only loves its own heroes.
ReplyDeleteYou are right. I am constantly accused of being a liberal because of my stand on the science. My family finds this to be hilarious. But, the point is, the perception is you have to be a liberal if you accept the science on the subject of climate change. As long as the perception exists, it is going to be hard to convince conservatives of the reality.
ReplyDelete