(UPDATE: The original submission was too long to be accepted. Below is the updated, shorter version.)
Re “Reader's view: Resist calls to smother climate debate,”
March 20, by Tom Harris.
Mr. Harris’ claim that scientists are stifling debate on climate
change is false. There is a healthy debate on this topic. What the scientific community
is opposed to is people interjecting anti-science rhetoric into the discussion.
Harris is the executive director of the Canadian fossil fuel advocacy group
International Climate Science Coalition and is paid to place pro-fossil
fuel/anti-science letters for public consumption.
Harris states, “no sensible person, … denies that climate
changes.” In fact, Mr. Harris is on record as denying climate change. The
reality is that the climate is changing and is changing much more dramatically
than at anytime in the last 800,000 years. Harris also says this fact is
“irrelevant to anyone but specialists in the field” when it is actually relevant
to everyone. Polls show over 97% of all climate scientists acknowledge the reality
of manmade climate change. Harris is deceitful stating no such poll has ever
been taken.
Harris’ quotes Dr. Tim Ball. Ball is a geographer, not a
climatologist. In a libel suit he was forced to drop, court documents stated
about Ball, "The Plaintiff's credentials and credibility as an expert on
the issue of global warming have been repeatedly disparaged in the media.” And,
“The Plaintiff is viewed as a paid promoter of the agenda of the oil and gas
industry rather than as a practicing scientist." Ball stated carbon
dioxide is not a greenhouse gas. This is the equivalent of saying gravity
doesn’t exist. The properties of CO2 as a greenhouse gas are well
documented.
Any debate should be limited to real science, not
anti-science rhetoric.
Dr. Christopher Keating
Mason, Texas
Dr. Keating is a professor of physics and conducts research
in planetary geophysics, including climate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment