Robert's clearly genuine misconception about thermal emissions being the cause of global warming is sometimes used in articles where it appears as if the author is being deliberately misleading. As in one I saw where the heat released by undersea volcanoes was being compared with our thermal emissions, implying that this comparison had relevance.With regard to another irrelevant point Robert made: Many coolants and methods of cooling electronics are used and in a few situations carbon dioxide is preferred to air, despite its higher cost.However, I totally agree with Robert that people need to talk about the subject, as well as listening to what other people say.
I am totally in agreement with the idea of 'talking.' Unfortunately, much of it has fallen into screaming arguments. And, there is a definite strategy on the part of the deniers to bully and intimidate climate scientists in the hope of driving them from the public forum. Unfortunately, the strategy is working very well. Scientists, in general, simply will not engage in public discussion of the topic because of the personal, and sometimes vicious, attacks. Scientists are not trained or experienced for that kind of hand-to-hand combat and the denier organizations know this. If we can get them to drop that strategy then I think you can get the scientists to come back to the discussion.
Yet you blindly believe in global warming without NY proof.
No proof? Wow!
Wows not good enough. Here's some proof. TheEarth has cooled 16 years running. And Carbon makes up less than 5 percent of the greenhouse gases.
Dude, take some time to read the other submissions before you go ruining your supper. Those Your complaint has been answered multiple times.
Like I said, Wow!
Yes, screaming arguments is a good way of describing the way some people act on the internet. In my latest book, which may never get published. (Nearly all my previous books are for children and I'm not even sure my latest book would appeal to people of any age) I used the phase "virulentslanging match jokingly called a ‘debate’ between the so called ‘deniers’ andthe so called ‘alarmists’ about Global Warming."I had the same problem writing about evolution and I have given up article writing about evolution because of the totally offensive and irrelevant insults I was receiving. Now I only mention evolution when it is unavoidable in the context, as in my book about Koalas. In my latest book rapid evolution driven by global warming is an integral part of the book, so I can't avoid it.I admire your persistence in the face of the insults you have received on this blog.
I would love to write a book on evolution, but your comments illustrate why I am holding back. Just how many fights can I pick before I get overwhelmed?
From one of his other posts: "There's no doubt in my mind that Westminster is the centre of a satanic abuse network." Should we be surprised that one of most deluded deniers also believes that the devil runs the English parliament?
The Earth can warm and cool on its own natural cycle but what the fuss is about is that we have broken the cycle and instead of cooling we are going to get very warm. Its called global warming and it is caused by burning fossil fuels. Its not difficult to grasp. Read it up. http://globalwarmingsimplified.weebly.com/